PEPFAR Quality Control and Method Validation Activity 14: Part 2

nnown Absolute Points also Site's 55 prop€ solute Paired Data Calculator range 60 other also lAbs flagging may occur lower no longer matters? no matters? Manually draw a stra"ght line through as many points as Manually draw a straight line through as many points as xyz Analyzer Compare Intecv•ew: Westgard Intercept Interview Westgard Control God HIGH regression with data a ity to the Reference LOW tow Mfg's AMR CRR Analyte Value o Value O Value Evaluations Dialudations Dialuations Comparative XYZ Analyzer 0.99 Drugs — No interference at therapeutic concentrations; Roche Cobas of error and uncertainty. But tho latest "round" in tho debate is depressingly tamiliar. 2 IF IYO Roche possible, making sure that the line adheres to the lower Part 2 if quality does If quality does Manually collected for the other experiments to determine the Ilected for the other expe 70M collected for the experiments to determine the 2016 Westgard Award: Linda The Y—intercept for assays with low 7011 2016 Wes:gard Award: in The Pathologist Comparative Calculator IYO 1 Range Password Isoniazid may cause artificially low and Furosemide may Method Westgard Award: Linda S Resources Method (X) XYZ Analyzer xyz Analyzer test Method points. Method rest points. Method (X) possible. Verified Regression Calculator cause artificially high AST results at therapeutic matter. how are you 7011 7011 Thienpont Ph.D, Roche the y-axis the assigned value 96 or on the x-axis, Method (X) An alternative to creating a graph is to use the Linear-data An a points you Thienpcn: Pharm, Ph.D. Comparative 702 For AST on the Cobas c501, the Calculator Quantifying highest standard first. It is possible that Quantifying Sigma-metrics for HBV Method concentrations concentrations Continue Reading going to assure It? going to assure it? Method 355 353 -2.06 -0.58 35.61 2 IYO -os. Plotter located on the www.westgard.com website. xyz Analyzer XYZ Analyzer e. Comparative Method Method (X) An altem Zero-point Seto-point Roche Cobas 3 35'. -2.06 35.61 10b westgard acre Method 5-700 U/L 5-700 IJ/L 5-700 UJ/L Errors EX:ALT EXALT 2.5 205 770 5-7000 1:10 5 - 7000 Quality in the Spothght: An amount of error present Quality the Spot',ight: An Pool 5 708 Average: XYZ Analyzer Visually inspect the plot for a linear relationship. 3 355 353 2. 31 17 70M 706 38 Plotter xyz Analyzer Method (X) XYZ Analyzer Method (X) 7011 Method Test Method 70 Calculate alculate Test Method O, not CALCULATORS Copyright 2009. 3 355 354 353 354 Y Z Analyzer Note On the graph the Observed linearity range. Note On the graph the observed linearity range. Note (Y) numerical values should be 0.0 ± 1.0. Remember A series of known relationships establish' Comparative Method An IQCP Primer from MU Survey 2015: Remember me Method Cornparative A series of known relationships established by dilution series of k 3 355 354 353 354 356. 35} 355 353 23 CLSI EP15-A3: Reportable Range TEA 140.8 Date and sign your initials. Yin+eccep+ dilution used on-board is 1:10 Method (X) rest Method Method Slope Yin+eccep+ eth0d (X) File the graph In the linearity portion of your method C. the Real World Labs Speak Out verification of Method Comparing Verdicts XYZ Analyzer Westgard QC, Inc., 7614 Gray Method QC QC 7614 the test is nonlinear at its highest value. Calculator: Recording Ytn+eccep+ 5, GO Cornparative (X) validation binder. valudation binder. Bias, Bias, %Bias Regression Calculator Yin+eccep+ 5. GO Assigned Value Comparative 5 - 7000 6 - 7000 Intercept y -intercept 5.6037 5 - 700 3 355 353 -2.0 o.qq Analyzer SD, O/ocv o.qq xyz An validation e_JB XYZ Analyzer TEA AST Calculate Averages XYZ ADR Method 5)) 529 528 527 SR Method (X) Slope Call 608-833-47183 or e-mail Call or Yr+eccep+ 5. GO page 3 page 2 3 704 70M 6 - 7000 1:10 or the Difference between XYZ Analyzer Comparative o.qq Test Method 'eth0d Calculate Roche Cobas 3 of6 30f6 Activity 14: Introduction to Method Evaluation Activity 14A: to Method Evaluation •14A: to Method Evaluation Method Method (X) Show Graph Activity -14: Introduction to Method Evaluation Activity 14: Introduction to Method o.qq 5 70 0.999 0.9853 University of California, Santa Cruz. (2012, May). Linearity Testing (Reportable Range) Calibration University of California, Santa Cruz. (2012, May). Linearity Testing (Reportable Range) Calibration 35 4. 40 38 37 35 36 33 39 3. University of California, Santa Cruz. (2012, May). Linearity Testing (Reportable Range) Calibration3 Comparative Methods from 32 34 31 Last May 3, 2013 41 55 27 Modified from pSMILE.org website. Last accessed May 3.2013 Slope Method Verification. Retrieved April 5, 2013, from http:shs-manual.ucsc.edu/policy/linearity-testing-reportable- Verification. Retrieved Aprii 5, 2013, from http:shs-manuai.ucsc.edu/policy/linearity•testing•reportable- -25 Method (X) range-calibration-verification Comparison Plotter y -interce