PEPconnect

PEPFAR Quality Control and Method Validation Activity 4: Part 2

In this activity, participants are provided with QC charts and a Westgard Multirule algorithm and must apply the decision-making process to determine acceptability of the analytical run.

Note: Any reference to page numbers in the video may not correlate with supporting documents as documents may have been updated.

2) Type and number of GCs ±es+ed Frequency of QC +es+ even+s Laboratory 3 Type number of GC sampks ±es+ed 3 Type number of GC +esfed System 2) Type number Of QC sampks ±esfed 3 Type numbec Of QC sampks ±esfed Type number Of QC ±es+ed Type number Of QC sampks ±es+ed 3 Type number of QC ±es+ed Type and number ±es+ed Type number of GC sampks Type and number of QC ±es+ed Type number sampks tesfed Type number of QC ±es+ed Type number sampks •tes+ed and number sampes tes+ed Scenario #1 2 Type and number of tes+ed 2 Type number Of (X tesfed l) Frequency of sampe +es+ even+s 3) QC used Scenarios #1 and #2 number 3) Type and number of GC ±es+ed 2) Type and number sampés tes+ed review System analy+ica\ Analytical {Type avid number of sampks +es+ed enario #1 3) used +0 or and number of GC ±esfed Type and number of GC ±es+ed 2) Type and number of GC ±es+ed 2) Type number of GC ±es+ed QC used Scenarios #1 and #2 2) Type number sampks ±es+ed QC used +0 3) QC used +0 QC +0 QC ased +0 2 Type and number of QC sampks +es+ed used +0 evalua+e 'Analytical Results aAnalyiical Type number ±es+ed rend s •System or Quality ype and number ofGC sampés ±es+ed review QC used +0 3) QC used Qualit Laborator System Analytical evaluaVe evalua+e QC used QC +0 Laborator Type and number of Qampes tes+ed review for Traditional 'Westgard Rules' review Laboratory Results and used +0 System Quality Quali.y Quality Crate: Cete: Czte: Quality - review For Scenarios and 52 - review for QC used +0 review Analytical Laborator rends used +0 Results hen re Report Results rends review for Labr,rator Laboratory Results or Laborator or Type number tested In-Control QC used Laborator evalaa+e review for Laboratory ERE WE System System Quality rends rend S Results Res Tevtew For Results Cete: Ceata: Ceta Ceta: [Results rends Results Quality Tech: rends review quality hen rends Laborator Tevtew for hen resul+s Quality Laborator hen resul+s I hen resul+s ; ro revtew for Results Results - review for hen resal+s review Scenot\0 hen resul+s nen reed+s Laborator rend s for hen resul+s rends Results Quality Idualit rend S review Scenoci0 Results rend 3 rends Scenario 3 Laborator hen resul+s Scenacio ERE WE Scenario Z rends hen resdl+s Results Scenacio Results Scenacio Results Scenario 3 Quality hen resul+s Control or ERE WE Scenonio Scenario S Scenario I Scenario \ Scenario 3 Scenario I hen resul+s .ua it ua it ua It Scenario 3 uai Scenacio Scenacio I Scenotic 3 No enacio Scenacio ERE WE RE Control ERE ar ERE WE ar ERE we WE we wr ro yste Table l: Scena€io Control Table l: Table I : Scenario I Table l: oneControl In-Control _,-Control ua It one point out Control ERE WE EXPECT ro ro In-Control Table l: ERE WE l: 7 l: Scenafio Scenario Report WHERE WE ARE 7, IL Quality Scenario 3 l: 7, 'L Table 3 Scenacio Scenacio or Scenario 3 WHERE WE WHERE WE ARE we ERE we Wei: Control of 2 SD SD 3: able l: WHERE we yste Control we System - ualit 7, L WHERE WE ARE Table l: WHERE WE ARE yste Syste In-Control Control Table l: 2: Z: 3: one control Z: Table 3 yste Table l: 7 Table 27 3: ERE WE expect ro WHERE W 3: 21 WHERE we vstem 3: Table 3: 7, Z we or Table 3: / 3: l: Z: 3: TQbte 3: WHERE we 3: q: SAMPLE System WHERE WE ARE S ste WHERE we ARE WHERE A Re Table PROFICIENCY Syste_ l: ystem PATIENT 3: Z: Table 3: l: 3: Leq: Table PROFICIENCY TQbLe q: Table q: PATIENT TabLe SAMPLE PATIENT H : 3: PATIENT Z System PATIENT PATIENT Table l: 3: / l: FICIENCY PROFICIENC System_ PROFICIE' PROFICIENCY PROFICIENCV lox PROFICIEDCY PATIENT TQbLe H: 225 PATIENT Z PATIENT PATIENT Scenario Z No T Scenario Scenacio PROFICIENCY TING (PT) Table PATIENT SAMPLE Table l : TQbLe q: TESTING TESTING (PT TESTING (PT) TESTING 40 CONSECUTIVE 2 CONSECUJTME 10 CONSECUTIVE 20 CONSECUTMVE SA PATIENT 40 CONSECUTIVE 10 CONSECUTMVE 20 CONSECUTMVE SAMPLE PROFICIENCY SAMPLE SAM PLE TESTING (PT) b:ross runs) B:ross runs) one point out one point SAMPLE The range one gent SAMPLE control values on co values on Yes yes Yes SAMPLE PATIENT Z PROFICIEN values on ONE SAMPLE SA PATIENT Scenario Z yes PATIENT 2 out SD out sick SD outsick SD SO 2 CONSCIJTME 2 CONSECUJTME CONSCIJTME (difference) between Edifference) between 'Ion SAMPLE one sick of the one si&ofthe TESTIN 14 PATIENT wen PATIENT sick of the mean. SAMPLE 2: ualues outsBe the values outside the ualuesoutsBethe ualues outside the values outsßethe values outsßde the mean and further TESTIN PROFICIEDCY SAMPLE SAM PLE tv,ocontrols within a tw,ocontrols within a tw,ocontaols within a twocontrols within a 3: TESTING Table H Table H: PROFICIENC SA Yes than ISD from than ISD forom than ISO from Scot e Table l: same 2 SD same 2 SO run ocead54SD 5. run ocea:i54SD 5. run ocead54SD s. run ecea:i54SD 5. Table H : Th is can ba within Th is can be within This can ba within same Ston SAMP Son Score the rrean. SAM b es This iscnlyto be This ruk iscnlyto be This iscnlyto te This Table or one an Score Score Syste l: or Yes Score (with in run) Scote escft b es escri b es b es is Ston usedwtthina run, not usedwtthina runt not 40 con secutiue runs 10 con secuth.re runs conecutitje runs. b es escrt b es escri es escfl b es escribes Table 3: yes Table l: escnt b es 2 CONSECIJTME able I Yes escfl b es across runs. B:ross runs) runs. one control In-Control and or S. escri b es Yes ualug ualuesoutsßethe values outsßethe ualuesoutsBethe 40 con secutiue runs 10 con secuthre runs 4 consecutiue runs 4 conecuttue runs shon within 2 controls Score Ston ( and yes b es escft b es escrib es escrt b es and SAME SD. SAME SO. SD. a:ross 2 across 5 IS yes with in 2 controls and b e runs. escri b e Yes escrt b es a:ross 2 IS IS cote re IS IS +he IS conecutite runs. conecutilje runs. conecutitue runs. conecutitje runs. consecutite runs. 10 con secuthre runs consecutitje runs. and and Yes and IS +he IS Yes is ne+ ) +hen is is no+ Yes IS +he is IS IS the IS IS as occutted. and as occuvced as ) +hen ) *hen +hen as occurted is as occuvced. s occucced . as occuvted Out-of-Control, Fkjeä Analytirzl Run Out-of-Control, Rejeä Analytirzl Run ) *hen ) +hen e analyiical analy+ical Analytical is e analy+ical anqly+ical analyiica\ as occuvted e qnalyiical e analy+ica I and e analyiica I analyiical IS occuvted ' as occuvted as occuvted as occutted us occuvced as occuvced. , as occuvted. as occuvted. as occuned as occuqqed. as occunted as occutfed analy+ica I ) +hen as occuvced + hen as as occutced Image from http://www.westgard.com/downloads/cat_view/53-worksieets Image from http://www.westgard.com/downloads/cat_view/53-worksineets ) *hen e analy+ical tas occuned. analyiica\ e analy+ical anqly+ical

  • front line worker
  • analytical run
  • QC charts
  • Westgard Multirule algorithm
  • acceptability
  • SLIPTA
  • SLIPTA Checklist
  • multirules
  • error detection
  • false rejection
  • warning rules
  • 1:2s