PEPconnect

Advances in Breast Imaging - Morphology of Lesions: 2D FFDM vs. 3D wide-angle DBT Online Training

This online training covers the following topics:
  • Asymmetries and spiculated masses
  • Microcalcifications
  • Distortions
  • Detection of additional lesions
The training includes 2 presentations and 15 case discussions, 2 questions (knowledge checks) for a self-check, a course review and a final assessment.

Continue Continue Introduction 3 Morphology of Lesions: 2D FFDM vs. 3D Wide-angle DBT Online Training This training module compares the display of masses, calcifications, and distortions in 2D mammography with their display in 3D tomosynthesis. Completion time: 75 min. Asymmetries and Spiculated Masses 1 Detection of Additional Lesions 4 Distortions 3 Microcalcification 2 Master Template HOOD05162003052540 | Effective Date: 26-Nov-2019 Welcome Srechertext: Welcome to our Web-based training “Advances in breast imaging.” In the third module, “Morphology of lesions: 2D FFDM vs. 3D wide-angle DBT,” Dr. Maria Bernathova will take a closer look at lesions. She’ll compare displays of masses, calcifications, and distortions in 2D mammography with displays in 3D tomosynthesis. This 75-minute Web-based training is enhanced with discussions of numerous clinical cases. Introduction Dr. Maria Bernathova Medical University of Vienna, Austria Introduction 04_Morphology-of-lesions_02-Intro-to-lecture_V02.mp4 Asymmetries and Spiculated Masses Asymmetries and Spiculated Masses Dr. Maria Bernathova Medical University of Vienna, Austria Asymmetries and Spiculated Masses 04_Morphology-of-lesions_03-Asymmetries-and-spiculated-masses_V02.mp4 The mimic effect of overlapping structures can be reduced. This results in fewer false-positive results. The mask effect of overlapping structures can be reduced. This results in fewer false-negative results. Low-contrast masses benefit the most from the ability to separate tissue in the z-direction. In-depth resolution isn’t important; only the in-plane resolution has a clinical impact. What is not a clinical benefit of high in-depth resolution? Knowledge Check Select the best answer. Knowledge Check Correct Incorrect The solution: In-depth resolution isn’t important; only the in-plane resolution has a clinical impact. Incorrect The solution: In-depth resolution isn’t important; only the in-plane resolution has a clinical impact. Correct The solution: In-depth resolution isn’t important; only the in-plane resolution has a clinical impact. Explanation of the Correct Answer Continue In-depth resolution is most important for overcoming the overlapping effect, which causes masking (FN) and mimicking (FP) of lesions, and the conspicuity of masses. In-plane resolution is important for detecting microcalcifications. Explanation of the Correct Answer Microcalcification Microcalcification Dr. Maria Bernathova Medical University of Vienna, Austria Microcalcification 04_Morphology-of-lesions_05-Calcification_V02.mp4 Which lesion in 2D mammography doesn’t correspond with the lesion in 3D tomosynthesis? Knowledge Check Select the applicable image. Knowledge Check Incorrect That is the correct picture: Incorrect That is the correct picture: Correct Explanation of the Correct Answer Continue Explanation of the Correct Answer Distortions Distortions Dr. Maria Bernathova Medical University of Vienna, Austria Distortions 04_Morphology-of-lesions_06-Distortion_V02.mp4 Case Discussions – Morphology of Lesions Spiculated masses Microcalcifications Distortions Select the steps below or the images on the right to watch the case discussions. 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 7 8 8 8 Case Discussions - Morphology of Lesions 1806_siemens_xp_academy_bernathova_no_audience_case_19.mp4 1909_shs_xp_tomo_training_van_ongeval_case_13_v03.mp4 1806_siemens_xp_academy_bernathova_no_audience_case_02_V02.mp4 1909_shs_xp_tomo_training_van_ongeval_case_09_v04.mp4 1806_siemens_xp_academy_bernathova_no_audience_case_26_V02.mp4 1806_siemens_xp_academy_bernathova_no_audience_case_28.mp4 1909_shs_xp_tomo_training_van_ongeval_case_02_v03.mp4 1806_siemens_xp_academy_bernathova_no_audience_case_06.mp4 Case Discussion 8 Distortions in a dense breast Case Discussion 7 Distortions in a heterogeneously dense breast Case Discussion 6 Microcalc in a heterogeneously dense breast Case Discussion 5 Microcalc in a scattered breast Case Discussion 4 Spiculated mass in a dense breast Case Discussion 3 Mass in a heterogeneously dense breast Case Discussion 2 Spiculated mass in a scattered breast Case Discussion Spiculated mass in a fatty breast 1 Detection of Additional Lesions Detection of Additional Lesions Dr. Maria Bernathova Medical University of Vienna, Austria Detection of Additional Lesions 04_Morphology-of-lesions_04-Detection-of-additional-lesions_V02.mp4 Case Discussions – Tumor Size and Multifocality Select the steps below or the images on the right to watch the case discussions. 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 7 Case Discussions - Tumor Size and Multifocality 1806_siemens_xp_academy_pina_no_audience_case_06.mp4 1806_siemens_xp_academy_pina_no_audience_case_01.mp4 1909_shs_xp_tomo_training_van_ongeval_case_08_v03.mp4 1909_shs_xp_tomo_training_van_ongeval_case_11_v03.mp4 1806_siemens_xp_academy_pina_no_audience_case_16.mp4 1806_siemens_xp_academy_bernathova_no_audience_case_10_V02.mp4 1806_siemens_xp_academy_pina_no_audience_case_14.mp4 Case Discussion 7 Multifocal IDC in a heterogeneously dense breast Case Discussion 6 Contralateral IDC in a scattered breast Case Discussion 5 Multifocal ILC in a fatty breast Case Discussion 4 Tumor size of an IDC in a dense breast Case Discussion 3 Tumor size of an ILC in a heterogeneously dense breast Case Discussion 2 Tumor size of an ILC in a scattered breast Case Discussion Tumor size of an IDC in a fatty breast 1 Summary Summary Dr. Maria Bernathova Medical University of Vienna, Austria Summary 04_Morphology-of-lesions_07-Summary_V02.mp4 Course Review Detection of Additional Lesions Distortions Microcalcification Asymmetries and Spiculated Masses Course Review Here is a brief summary of the content covered in this training. Please select a topic to access the related information. 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 Course Review Detection of Additional Lesions DBT compared to FFDM Detects more additional lesions in the same breast: multifocality/multicentricity. Distortions DBT has a unique capacity to detect architectural distortions, leading to more true-positive and false-positive findings. Distortions only visible on DBT (without ultrasound correlation) require tomo-guided biopsy and have a 19 % likelihood of malignancy. Microcalcification DBT compared to FFDM Iceberg phenomena: better detection, and characterization of lesions with associated microcalc. Better visualization of the 3D distribution of microcalc. Evaluation of microcalc clusters requires experience with DBT reading. In general, microcalc is better detected in FFDM. Asymmetries and Spiculated Masses DBT compared to FFDM Improves detection of masses and architectural distortions, resulting in higher sensitivity. Reduces mimic effect resulting in fewer false-positive asymmetries. Offers higher conspicuity for spiculated masses. Following the market introduction in 2009, several clinical studies on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis have proven the value of this technique for breast imaging. For a list of Siemens Healthineers-related reference studies shown in this WBT, please download the PDF file XP_Tomosynthesis_Bibliography.pdf under “Resources” in the upper right corner on this page. The questions and course reviews depicted in this WBT also refer to additional reference studies that are subject of the clinical expert presentations. Reference Studies Reference Studies The herein illustrated statements made by Siemens Healthineers customers and physicians are based on their own and discrete opinion. The speaker is responsible for obtaining permission to use any previously published figures or tables. The speaker is also responsible for obtaining permission to reproduce any photograph showing recognizable persons. The statements by Siemens Healthineers customers described herein are based on results that were achieved in the customer's unique setting. Since there is no "typical" setting and many variables exist there can be no guarantee that other customers will achieve the same results. Some products/features (here mentioned) are not necessarily commercially available in all countries. Due to regulatory reasons their availability cannot be guaranteed. Please contact your local Siemens Healthineers organization for further details. Copyright © Siemens Healthcare GmbH 2021 Siemens Healthineers Headquarters | Siemens Healthcare GmbH | Henkestr. 127 | 91052 Erlangen, Germany Telephone: +49 9131 84-0 | siemens-healthineers.com Disclaimer Disclaimer Assessment Assessment This assessment will test your retention of the presented content. A passing score of 80% or higher is required to complete the course and earn your certificate. You may repeat the assessment as many times as needed. Start Assessment The mimic effect of overlapping structures will increase, resulting in a higher detection rate. In-depth resolution isn’t important; only the in-plane resolution has a clinical impact. The mask effect of overlapping structures can be reduced, resulting in fewer false-negative results. Which of the following is a clinical benefit of high in-depth resolution? Question 1 of 5 Select the best answer. Frage Correct Incorrect You did not select the correct answer. Incorrect You did not select the correct answer. Which lesion from 2D mammography doesn’t correspond with the lesion from 3D tomosynthesis? Question 2 of 5 Select the applicable image. Question Incorrect You did not select the correct answer. Incorrect You did not select the correct answer. Correct … reduces detection of masses and architectural distortions, resulting in lower sensitivity. … offers lower conspicuity of spiculated masses. … reduces the mimic effect, resulting in fewer false-positive asymmetries. Which statement is true regarding symmetries and spiculated masses? DBT compared to FFDM … Question 3 of 5 Select the best answer. Question Correct Incorrect You did not select the correct answer. Incorrect You did not select the correct answer. The evaluation of microcalcification clusters is very easy with DBT as single microcalc spots are distributed on several DBT slices. In general, an FFDM or synthetic mammogram isn’t needed to detect microcalcifications and evaluate microcalcification clusters. Iceberg phenomena describes the better detection and characterization of lesions with associated microcalcifications. Which of the following statements is true regarding microcalcifications in DBT compared to FFDM? Question 4 of 5 Select the best answer. Frage Correct Incorrect You did not select the correct answer. Incorrect You did not select the correct answer. Distortions only visible with DBT should be biopsied using guided ultrasound. DBT leads to fewer true-positive findings. DBT has a unique ability to better detect architectural distortions. Which of the following statements is true regarding distortions? Question 5 of 5 Select the best answer. Frage Correct Incorrect You did not select the correct answer. Incorrect You did not select the correct answer. Review Review Retry Assessment Results %Results.ScorePercent%% %Results.PassPercent%% Continue YOUR SCORE: PASSING SCORE: Results Slide You did not pass the course. Take time to review the assessment then select Retry to continue. Congratulations. You passed the course. Exit To access your Certificate of Completion, select the Launch button drop down on the course overview page. You can also access the certificate from your PEPconnect transcript. You have completed the training module no. 3 from training series “Advances in Breast Imaging”. Completion Sprechertext: Thank you for your attention! You have completed the training module no. 3 from training series “Advances in Breast Imaging”. HOOD05162003171396 | Effective Date: 20-APR-2021 XP_Tomosynthesis_Bibliography.pdf 2D Two-dimensional 3D Three-dimensional AI Artificial Intelligence AUC Area Under the Curve BPE Background Parenchymal Enhancement CAD Computer Aided Detection CC Cranio-caudal CEM Contrast Enhanced Mammography CESM Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography CNB Core Needle Biopsy DBT Digital Breast Tomosynthesis DCIS Ductal carcinoma in situ DM Digital Mammography FFDM Full Field Digital Mammography FN False Negative FP False Positive i.m. intramuscular IDC Invasive ductal carcinoma ILC Invasive lobular carcinoma IN Insight = Sythetic Mammogram for wide-angle Tomosynthesis IT Information Technology MAG Magnification View MB Megabyte MG Mammogramm ML Medio-lateral MLO Medio-lateral-oblique MP Megapixel MRI Magnetic Resonance Imaging NCB Needle Core Biopsy NPV Negative Predictive Value PPV Positive Predictive Value pRCT Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial ROC Receiver Operating Characteristic STX Stereotaxis TiCEM Titanium Contrast Enhanced Mammography TN True Negative TP True Positive US Ultrasound wa-DBT wide-angle Digital Breast Tomosynthesis WBT Web-based Training 1.1 Welcome 1.2 Introduction 2.1 Asymmetries and Spiculated Masses 2.2 Knowledge Check 3.1 Microcalcification 3.2 Knowledge Check 4.1 Distortions 4.2 Case Discussions - Morphology of Lesions 5.1 Detection of Additional Lesions 5.2 Case Discussions - Tumor Size and Multifocality 6.1 Summary 7.1 Course Review 7.2 Reference Studies 7.3 Disclaimer 8.1 Assessment 8.8 Completion

  • breast tomosynthesis
  • DBT
  • wide-angle tomosynthesis
  • dose
  • image quality
  • tomosynthesis
  • FFDM
  • mammography
  • synthetic mammogram
  • microcalc
  • calcification
  • distortion
  • mass